sustained EB-2 Case: Business Consulting

(b)(6)
Date: FEB 0 6 2013 
INRE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: . 
.u;s. Department of Homeland Security 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 
20 Massachusetts Ave., N. W ., MS 2090 ' 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER~ FILE: 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced 
Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to ~ection 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C § 1153(b)(2) . 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
Enclosed please ·fmd the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents 
related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that 
any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. 
ftf\' 
\J.~~g 
Actiitg Chief, Administrative Appeals Office · 
www.uscis.gov 
(b)(6)
,.., 
Page2 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, 
Nebraska Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The 
appeal is sustained, and the petition is approved. 
The petitioner is an operations and sourcing consulting company.1 It seeks to employ the beneficiary 
permanently in the United States as a senior manager of strategic consulting pursuant to section · 
203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2). As required by 
statute, a labor certification accompanied the petition. The director determined thai the petitioner 
had not established that it had the continuing ability to ·pay the beneficiary the proffered wage 
beginning on the priority date of the visa petition. The director denied the petition accordingly. 
The AAO conducts appellate review on a de novo basis. See Soltane v. DOJ, 381 F.3d 143, 145 (3d 
Cir. 2004). . 
In pertinent part, section 203(b)(2) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2), provides immigrant 
classification to members of the professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalent and whose 
services are sought by an employer in the United States. An advanced degree is a United States 
academic or professional degree or a foreign equivalent degree above the baccalaureate level. 8 
C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2). The regulation further states: "A United States .baccalaureate degl-ee or a 
foreign equivalent degree followed by at least five years of progressive experience in the . specialty 
shall be considered the equivalent of a master's degree. If a doctoral degree is customarily required 
by the specialty, the alien must have a United States doctorate or a foreign equivalent degree." /d. 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2) states in pertinent part: 
Ability of prospective employer to pay wage. Any petition filed by or for an 
employment-based immigrant which requires an offer of employment · must be 
accompanied by evidence that the prospective Umted States employer 
has the ability 
to pay the proffered wage .. The petitioner must demonstrate this ability at the time the 
priority date is ·established and continuing until the beneficiary obtains lawful 
permanent residence. Evidence of this ability shall be either in the form of copies of 
annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements. 
The petitioner must demonstrate the continuing ability to pay . the proffered wage beginning on the 
priority date, which is the date the ETA Form 9089, Application for Permanent Employment 
Certification, was accepted for processing by any office within the employment system of the DOL. 
See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(d). The petitioner must also demonstrate that, on the priority date, the beneficiary 
had the qualifications stated on its ETA Form 9089 as certified by the DOL and submitted with the 
instant petition. Matter of Wing's Tea House, 16l&N Dec. 158 (Act. Reg. Comm. 1977). 
1 The petitioner was succeeded by way of merger by 
2011. 
on May 26, 
(b)(6)
Page3 
Upon review .of the entire record, including evidence submitted on appeal and in response to a Notice of 
Intent to Dismiss (NOID) issued by the AAO, the AAO concludes that the petitioner has established 
that it had the continuing ability to pay the beneficiary the proffe~ wage beginning on the priority date. 
ofthe visa petition. Accordingly, the petition is approved under section 203(b)(2) ofthe Act, 8 U.S.C. 
§ 1153(b )(2). 
The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 
8 U.S.C. § 1361. The petitioner has met that burden. 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained, and ihe petition is approved. 
!