sustained EB-2

sustained EB-2 Case: Internet Development

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Internet Development

Decision Summary

The director initially denied the petition, finding that the beneficiary did not meet the minimum education level required by the labor certification. Upon de novo review, the AAO concluded that the petitioner had successfully demonstrated that the beneficiary possessed all the necessary education, training, and experience as of the priority date, thereby qualifying for the requested visa classification.

Criteria Discussed

Advanced Degree Equivalence Meeting Labor Certification Requirements Progressive Experience

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
(b)(6)
Date: FEB 0 ยท 1 2013 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER 
INRE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: 
U:S.Departm.e"ilt of.Hcirneland SeCUrity. 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 
20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
FILE: 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced 
Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(2) 
ON aEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents 
related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that 
any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made. to that office. 
Ron Rosenberg 
Acting Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
. www.uscis;gov 
(b)(6)
> .. 
Page2 
DISCUSSION: The preference visa petition was denied by the Director, Texas Service Center, and 
is now before the Administrative Appeals Office {AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be sustained. 
The petitioner is a prepaid card systems and processing company. It seeks to employ the beneficiary 
permanently in the United States as a lead internet developer. AS required by statute, the petition is 
accompanied by an ETA Form 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification, 
approved by the United States Department of Labor (DOL). Upon reviewing the petition, the 
director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the 
labor certification. The director denied the.petition accordingly. 
The AAO conducts appellate review on a de novo basis. See Soltane v. DOJ, 381 F.3d 143, 145 (3d 
Cir. 2004). ยท 
In pertinent part, section 203(b)(2) of the Immigrati6n and Nationality Act {the Act), 8 U.S.C. ยง 
1153(b )(2), provides immigrant classification to members of the professions holding advanced 
degrees or their equivalent and whose services are sought by an employer in the United States. An 
advanced degree is a United States academic or professional degree or a foreign equivalent degree 
above the baccalaureate level. 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(k)(2). The regulation further states: "A United 
States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree followed by at least five years of 
progressive experience in the specialty shall be considered the equivalent o(a master's degree. If a 
doctoral degree is customarily required by the specialty, the alien must have a United States 
doc~orate or a foreign equivalent degree." ld. 
To be eligible for approval, a beneficiary must have all the education, training, and experience specified 
on the labor certification as of the petition's priority date. See Matter of Wing's Tea House, 16 I&N 
158 {Act. Reg. Comm. 1977). The priority date of the p~tition is November 29, 2011, which is the 
date the labor certification was accepted for processing by the DOL. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(d). The 
Immigrant 
Petition for Alien Worker (Form I-140) was filed on April18, 2012. 
Upon review of the entire record, including materials submitted on appeal, the AAO concludes that the 
petitioner has established that it is more likely than not that the beneficiary had all the education, 
training, and experience specified on the ETA Form 9089 as of November 29, 2011. Therefore, the 
beneficiary qualifies for preference visa classification under section 203(b )(2) of the Act. 
The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 
8 U.S.C. ยง 1361. The petitioner has met that burden. 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained, and the petition is approved. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.