sustained
EB-2
sustained EB-2 Case: Neurophysiology
Decision Summary
The director initially denied the petition, concluding the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification. The AAO conducted a de novo review and, based on the entire record including new evidence, found that the petitioner had established the beneficiary met all the education, training, and experience requirements as of the priority date.
Criteria Discussed
Advanced Degree Requirements Labor Certification Requirements
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
identifyinE± cie!etedto preventcleanscnwarranted invasionofpersonalprivacy PUBLICCOPY U.S.Departmentof HomelandSecurity U.S.Citizenshipandimmigrationsere AdministrativeAppealsOn'ice(AAo 20 MassachusettsAve., N.W, MS 20U0 Washington,De 20529-2090 8 U.S.Citizenship and Immigration Services Date: AUG2 0 2012 Office: NEBRASKA SERVICECENTER FILE: IN RE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: PETITION:ImmigrantPetitionfor Alien Workeras a Memberof the ProfessionsHoldingan Advanced Degreeor anAlien of ExceptionalAbility Pursuantto Section203(b)(2)of the Immigrationand Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.§ 1153(b)(2) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: Enclosedpleasefind the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents relatedto this matterhavebeenreturnedto theoffice that originally decidedyour case. Pleasebeadvisedthat any further inquiry that you might have concerning your casemust be made to that office. If you believe the AAO inappropriatelyapplied the law in reachingits decision,or you have additional informationthat you wish to haveconsidered,you may file a motionto reconsideror a motion to reopenin accordancewith the instructionson Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, with a fee of $630. The specific requirementsfor filing sucha motion can be found at 8 C.F.R. § 103.5. Do not file any motion directly with the AAO. Pleasebeawarethat8 C.F.R.§ 103.5(a)(1)(i)requiresanymotionto befiled within 30 daysof the decisionthat the motion seeksto reconsideror reopen. Thank you. PerryRhew Chief,AdministrativeAppealsOffice www.uscis.gov Page2 DISCUSSION: The employment-basedimmigrant visa petition was deniedby the Director. NebraskaServiceCenter,andis nowbeforetheAdministrativeAppealsOffice(AAO) onappeal The appealwill besustained. Thepetitioneris a medicalcenter.It seeksto employthebeneficiarypermanentlyin theUnitedStates as a researchassociate(neurophysiology)pursuantto section203(b)(2)of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2). As requiredby statute,a labor certification accompaniedthepetition. Thedirectordeterminedthatthebeneficiarydid not satisfytheminimum levelof educationstatedonthelaborcertification. Thedirectordeniedthepetitionaccordingly. TheAAO conductsappellatereviewon adenovobasis.SeeSoltanev.DOJ, 381F.3d143,145(3d Cir.2004). In pertinentpart, section203(b)(2)of the Immigrationand NationalityAct (the Act), 8 U.S.E § 1153(b)(2),providesimmigrant classificationto membersof the professionsholding advanced degreesor theirequivalentandwhoseservicesaresoughtby anemployerin theUnitedStates.An advanceddegreeis a UnitedStatesacademicor professionaldegreeor a foreignequivalentdegree abovethe baccalaureatelevel. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2). The regulationfurther states:"A United States baccalaureatedegree or a foreign equivalent degree followed by at least five years of progressiveexperiencein the specialtyshallbeconsideredtheequivalentof a master'sdegree.If a doctoral degreeis customarilyrequiredby the specialty,the alien must have a United States doctorateor a foreignequivalentdegree." Id. To beeligibleforapproval,abeneficiarymusthaveall theeducation,training,andexperiencespecified on the laborcertificationasof the petition's priority date. SeeMatter of Wing's TeaHouse, 16 l&N 158(Act. Reg.Comm.1977).Thepriority dateof thepetitionisJuly30,2008,whichis thedatethe labor certification was acceptedfor processingby the DOL. See 8 C.F.R. §204.5(d). The ImmigrantPetitionfor Alien Worker(FormI-140)wasfiled on May 18,2009. Uponreviewof theentirerecord,includingevidencesubmittedonappealandin responseto a Request for Evidenceissuedby theAAO, theAAO concludesthatthepetitionerhasestablishedthatit is more likely thannotthatthebeneficiaryhadall theeducation,training,andexperiencespecifiedonthelabor certificationasof July30,2008.Therefore,thebeneficiaryqualifiesfor preferencevisaclassification undersection203(b)(2)of theAct. The burdenof proof in theseproceedingsrestssolelywith the petitioner. Section291 of the Act 8 U.S.C.§ 1361. The petitionerhasmet thatburden. ORDER: Theappealissustained,andthepetitionis approved.
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.