sustained EB-2 Case: Software Engineering
Avoid this EB-2 denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner proved the beneficiary qualifies as an individual of exceptional ability under the EB-2 classification. The evidence successfully established that the beneficiary met at least three criteria: possessing over 10 years of experience, commanding a salary indicative of exceptional ability, and holding memberships in professional associations. The director's initial denial was deemed erroneous for having incorrectly evaluated the petition under the EB-3 standard.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.