dismissed EB-3

dismissed EB-3 Case: Beauty Supply

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Beauty Supply

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision. The petitioner stated they would submit a brief but failed to do so.

Criteria Discussed

Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Statement Of Fact

View Full Decision Text

U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF HA-YE-. INC. 
APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: DEC. 26. 2017 
PETITION: FORM I-140. IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner. a wholesale beauty supply company. seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a web 
administrator. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as a skilled worker under the third 
preference immigrant category. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 
203(b)(3)(A)(i). 8 U.S.C. § 1153(8)(3)(A)(i). The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the 
petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review. we will summarily dismiss the 
appeal. 
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the pmiy concerned 
fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1 )(v). 
The statement the Petitioner submitted in support of the appeal does not specifically identify an 
erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form 1-
2908. Notice of Appeal or Motion. the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be 
submitted within 30 days of tiling. However. we have not received anything further from the 
Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific. erroneous conclusion of 
law or statement of fact in the Director's decision belmv. the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1 03.3(a)(1 )(v). 
Cite as Matter ofHA-YE-. Inc .. ID# 828320 (AAO Dec. 26. 2017)

Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.