dismissed
EB-3
dismissed EB-3 Case: Culinary
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected on procedural grounds because it was filed by the beneficiary, not the petitioner. Under federal regulations, a beneficiary of a visa petition is prohibited from filing an appeal. Therefore, the AAO did not address the merits of the initial denial, which was based on the petitioner's failure to establish its ability to pay the proffered wage.
Criteria Discussed
Improper Filing By Beneficiary Ability To Pay
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
identifying data deleted to prevent clearly unwarranted invac?c'n nf n~rw32$ p~iva~y PUBLIC copy U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration .+y PETITION: Immigrant petition for Alien Worker as a Skilled Worker or Professional pursuant to section 203(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(3) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. Administrative Appeals Office DISCUSSION: The preference visa petition was denied by the Director, Texas Service Center. The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). The appeal will be rejected pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 6 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A). The petitioner is a restaurant and seeks to employ the beneficiary as a foreign food specialty cook. On October 11, 2004 the director denied the petition finding that the petitioner did not establish its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date to the present. The Form I-290B, Notice of appeal to the AAO, dated November 3, 2004 and signed by s the :::;- as filed with Texas Service Center on November 9,2004. The record of proceeding shows s the beneficiary of the instant visa petition. Citizenship and Immigration Services' (CIS) regu atlons speci lcally prohibit a beneficiary of a visa petition, or a representative acting on a beneficiary's behalf, from filing an appeal. 8 C.F.R. 6 103.3(a)(l)(iii)(B). As the appeal was not properly filed, it will be rejected. 8 C.F.R. 6 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A)(l). The record of proceeding contains a properly executed Form G-28 signed by the petitioner's representative and the attorney in record. A copy of this decision will be provided to the petitioner's last known counsel of record. As the appeal was improperly filed, the appeal must be rejected. ORDER: The appeal is rejected.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.