dismissed EB-3

dismissed EB-3 Case: Finance

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Finance

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to submit a brief or any additional evidence to support the appeal after indicating it would do so. The petitioner did not specifically address the reasons for the initial denial, leading to the dismissal.

Criteria Discussed

Professional Position Requirements Beneficiary'S Educational Qualifications

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF D-.F-, LLC 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: APR. 5, 2016 
APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, a manufacturer/wholesaler of oral products for consumers and dentists, seeks to 
permanently employ the Beneficiary in the United States as a credit analyst. It requests classification 
of the Beneficiary as a professional under the third preference immigrant classification. See 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), ยง 203(b )(3)(A)(ii), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b )(3)(A)(ii). This 
employment-based immigrant classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a professional with a 
baccalaureate degree for lawful permanent resident status. 
The Director determined that the offered position required less than a baccalaureate degree and did 
not qualify for classification as a professional. The Director further determined that the Beneficiary 
did not possess a baccalaureate degree from any college or university and did not meet the minimum 
requirements for the offered position or qualify for classification as a professional. 
The matter is now before us on appeal. The Petitioner dated the appeal September 11, 2014. The 
Petitioner indicated on Form I-1290B that it would submit a supplemental brief and/or additional 
evidence within 30 days. As of this date, more than 18 months later, we have received nothing further. 
The regulation requires that any brief shall be submitted directly to us. 8 C.F.R. ยงยง 103.3(a)(2)(vii) 
and (viii). We will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned 
does not identify specifically any erroneous conclusion oflaw or statement of fact for the appeal. 
The Petitioner here has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided 
any additional evidence. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
Cite as Matter of D-.F-, LLC, ID# 16189 (AAO Apr. 5, 2016) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.