dismissed
EB-3
dismissed EB-3 Case: Information Technology
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the Petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision. The Petitioner indicated that no supplemental brief or additional evidence would be submitted, leading to the dismissal.
Criteria Discussed
8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(A)(1)(V)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF M-, LLC APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: MAY 9, 2018 PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, an IT Services company, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a technical consultant. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as a professional under the third preference immigrant classification. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1!53(b)(3)(A)(ii). The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. An otlicer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(!)(v). On appeal, the Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision. On the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that no supplemental brief or additional evidence would be submitted. Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง I 03.3(a)(l )(v). Cite as Maller o(M-. LLC, ID# 1597220 (AAO May 9, 20 18)
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.