dismissed EB-3

dismissed EB-3 Case: Information Technology

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Information Technology

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the Petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision. The Petitioner indicated that no supplemental brief or additional evidence would be submitted, leading to the dismissal.

Criteria Discussed

8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(A)(1)(V)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF M-, LLC 
APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: MAY 9, 2018 
PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, an IT Services company, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a technical consultant. It 
requests classification of the Beneficiary as a professional under the third preference immigrant 
classification. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1!53(b)(3)(A)(ii). The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition. The matter is 
now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
An otlicer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(!)(v). 
On appeal, the Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically 
identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision. On the Form I-290B, Notice of 
Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that no supplemental brief or additional evidence would be 
submitted. Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or 
statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง I 03.3(a)(l )(v). 
Cite as Maller o(M-. LLC, ID# 1597220 (AAO May 9, 20 18) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.