remanded
EB-3
remanded EB-3 Case: Culinary
Decision Summary
The director revoked an approved I-140 petition based on a prior finding that the beneficiary had engaged in a fraudulent marriage, which is a bar to approval under INA 204(c). The AAO remanded the case because the director failed to follow the correct procedure, specifically by not issuing a Notice of Intent to Revoke as required by 8 C.F.R. § 205.2, which deprived the petitioner of the opportunity to respond.
Criteria Discussed
Marriage Fraud Bar (Ina 204(C)) Revocation On Notice (8 C.F.R. 205.2)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.