remanded
EB-3
remanded EB-3 Case: Culinary
Decision Summary
The director denied the petition, finding the petitioner had not established the ability to pay the proffered wage based on its 2001 tax return. The AAO remanded the case because the record suggested the beneficiary had been employed by the petitioner since 2000, and the director should have requested evidence of wages paid to the beneficiary before making a final decision. The case was sent back for the director to request this evidence and re-evaluate the petitioner's ability to pay.
Criteria Discussed
Ability To Pay Proffered Wage
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.