Remanded
EB-3
EB-3 Remanded — Information Technology (2018): the decision was remanded because the Director failed to
Decision Summary
The decision was remanded because the Director failed to consider if a typographical error on the labor certification, which ended with 'o,' could plausibly mean 'or related field' for the degree requirement. The AAO sent the case back for the Director to re-evaluate the beneficiary's educational qualifications and also to address deficiencies regarding the beneficiary's qualifying experience and the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary'S Education Beneficiary'S Experience Ability To Pay Proffered Wage Labor Certification Requirements
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →