Remanded
EB-3
EB-3 Remanded โ Investment Management (2018): the required evidence of the petitioner's ability to pay
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the required evidence of the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage for 2017, the priority date year, was not yet available at the time of the Director's decision. The AAO withdrew the decision and sent the case back to allow the petitioner the opportunity to submit the necessary financial documents for 2017, which should now be available.
Criteria Discussed
Ability To Pay Proffered Wage
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ