sustained
EB-3
sustained EB-3 Case: Culinary
Decision Summary
The Director initially revoked the petition, finding the beneficiary was unqualified, the petitioner lacked the ability to pay the proffered wage, and there was fraud. After an initial dismissal on appeal, the AAO reopened the matter on its own motion, withdrew its prior decision, and sustained the appeal, ultimately approving the petition.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary Qualifications Ability To Pay Proffered Wage Fraud
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
" Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office MATTER OF C-C- DATE; DEC. 12, 2016 APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a restaurant business, seeks to employ the Beneficiary permanently in the United States as a cook. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as a skilled worker under the third of the employment-based immigrant visa preferences. See Immigration and Nat~Qnality Act (the Act), section 203(b)(3)(A)(i), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(3)(A)(i). This immigrant classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a foreign national for lawful permanent resident status to work in a position that requires at least two years of training or experience. The Director, Texas Service Center, revoked the approval of the petition on February 17, 2011, finding that the record did not establish the Beneficiary's qualifications for the offered position or the Petitioner's ability to pay the Beneficiary the proffered wage. The Director also entered a finding of fraud against the Beneficiary. The Petitioner appealed the Director's decision. Upon de novo review of the record on appeal, in our decision, we withdrew the Director's fraud finding, but affirmed his revocation of the visa petition and dismissed the appeal. We now reopen the matter sua sponte. Based on further review, we will withdraw our prior decision and sustain the appeal. The petition will be approved. ORDER: The appeal is sustained. Cite as Matter ofC-C-, ID# 230906 (AAO Dec. 12, 2016)
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.