sustained
EB-3
sustained EB-3 Case: Information Technology
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition, finding the petitioner had not established it was a valid successor-in-interest or that it and its predecessor had the ability to pay the proffered wage. Upon de novo review of the full record, including evidence submitted on appeal, the AAO determined the petitioner successfully demonstrated both its status as a successor-in-interest and the requisite ability to pay.
Criteria Discussed
Successor-In-Interest Ability To Pay
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.