dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Electrical Services
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed on procedural grounds because it was filed by the beneficiary, not the petitioner. Per regulations, the beneficiary of a visa petition is not a recognized party in the proceeding and is not authorized to file an appeal.
Criteria Discussed
Standing To Appeal
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
identifyingdata deletedt~ed .preventclearly unw~ invasionof personalprlVaC} PUBLICCOpy U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000 Washington, DC 20529 u.s.Citizenship and Immigration Services JUH 2 b ZOO, FILE: SRC 06 009 50924 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: INRE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. , f//:'~;~rt P. Wiemann, Chief Administrative Appeals Office www.uscis.gov SRC 06 009 50924 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be rejected. The petitioner is a provider of electrical services. It seeks to extend its authorization to employ the beneficiary as an administrative assistant. The director denied the petition on the basis that the petitioner had not submitted a labor condition application valid for the requested period of employment. The beneficiary, not an authorized representative of the petitioner, signed the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) regulations specifically state that a beneficiary of a visa petition is not a recognized party in a proceeding. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.2(a)(3). As the beneficiary is not a recognized party, he is not authorized to file an appeal. 8 C.F.R. ยง I03.3(a)(l )(iii)(B). Accordingly, the AAO will reject the appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A)(l). ORDER: The appeal is rejected.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.