dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Information Technology
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed as abandoned. The AAO sent a letter to the Petitioner to verify its intent to pursue the appeal after discovering another company's H-1B petition for the same beneficiary had been approved, but the Petitioner did not respond.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation Abandonment
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 4772145 Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date : JAN. 16, 2020 The Petitioner, a company engaged in information technology consulting and services, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "business systems analyst" under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 10l(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) . The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attaimnent of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that that the Petitioner had not demonstrated that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that it has established eligibility for the benefit sought. We will dismiss the appeal. Our review of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) records indicates that on a date subsequent to your filing of the appeal, a different employer filed a Form I-129 petition also seeking H-lB nonimmigrant classification for the Beneficiary. USCIS records further indicate that this other petition was approved, for the period from November 2019 to September 2022. We sent a letter to the Petitioner requesting verification of its intent to pursue this appeal, and have not received a response. A benefit request may be denied as abandoned, denied based on the record, or denied for both reasons if a petitioner does not respond to a request for evidence or a notice of intent to deny by the required date. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.2(b)(13)(i). Therefore, the appeal will be dismissed as abandoned because the Petitioner did not respond to our request within the time permitted. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.