dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Information Technology
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed as abandoned because the Petitioner did not respond to an AAO request to verify its intent to pursue the appeal. The decision notes that a different employer's H-1B petition for the same Beneficiary had already been approved.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation Abandonment
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 9687290 Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: SEPT. 14, 2020 The Petitioner, an information technology company, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "computer scientist" under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that the position qualifies as a specialty occupation. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Director erred in denying the petition. We will dismiss the appeal. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicate that a different employer subsequently filed an H-lB petition on behalf of the Beneficiary, which has been approved. We sent a letter to the Petitioner requesting verification of its intent to pursue this appeal and did not receive a response within the allotted timeframe. A benefit request may be denied as abandoned, denied based on the record, or denied for both reasons if a petitioner does not respond to a request for evidence or a notice of intent to deny by the required date. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.2(b)(13)(i). Therefore, the appeal will be dismissed as abandoned because the Petitioner did not respond to our request within the time permitted. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed as abandoned pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.2(b)(13)(i).
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.