dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Information Technology

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Information Technology

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the matter was considered moot. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicated that the petitioner had filed a subsequent H-1B petition on behalf of the same beneficiary, and that petition had been approved, making further pursuit of the denied petition unnecessary.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation Mootness

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF M- INC. 
APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: SEPT. 19, 2019 
PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner, an IT consulting and solutions company, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as 
a "programmer/analyst" under the H-lB nonimrnigrant classification for specialty occupations. See 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 10l(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง l 10l(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b). 
The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a 
position that requires both ( a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized 
knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its 
equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. 
The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition , concluding that the Petitioner had not 
established that it met the regulatory filing requirements and that the proffered position qualifies as a 
specialty occupation. On appeal, the Petitioner asse11s that the Director erred in the decision. Upon 
de nova review, we will dismiss the appeal as the matter is now moot. 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicate that the Petitioner filed another Form 
1-129, Petition for a Non immigrant Worker, seeking H-1 B classification on behalf of the Beneficiary 
and that the petition was approved. Because the Beneficiary has been approved for H-lB employment 
with the Petitioner, further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 
Cite as Matter of M- Inc., ID# 5489759 (AAO Sept. 19, 2019) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.