dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Information Technology
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed as moot. Although the Director initially denied the petition because the proffered position did not qualify as a specialty occupation, the Petitioner had subsequently filed another H-1B petition for the same Beneficiary which was approved, rendering the appeal unnecessary.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF T-T-INC . Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: SEPT. 20, 2019 APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER The Petitioner, an information technology consulting services firm, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a ".Net developer" under the H-lB nonirnmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both: (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge; and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the evidence of record does not establish that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Director erred in the decision. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicate that the Petitioner filed another Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonirnmigrant Worker, seeking H-lB classification on behalf of the Beneficiary and that the petition was approved. Because the Beneficiary has been approved for H-IB employment with the Petitioner, further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. Cite as Matter ofT-T- Inc., ID# 4454595 (AAO Sept. 20, 2019)
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.