dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Information Technology

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Information Technology

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the issue was considered moot. USCIS records indicated that the Petitioner had filed a separate H-1B petition for the same Beneficiary which was approved, making further pursuit of the current appeal unnecessary.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF S-A--1 __ 
APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: OCT. 31, 2019 
PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner,.__ ________________ _, seeks to temporarily employ the 
Beneficiary as an "IT project associate" under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty 
occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified 
foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of 
highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific 
specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. 
The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record does not 
establish that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation . On appeal, the Petitioner 
submits additional evidence and asserts that the Director erred in denying the petition. 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicate that the Petitioner filed another Form 
1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, seeking H-lB classification on behalf of the Beneficiary 
and that the petition was approved. Because the Beneficiary has been approved for H-1 B employment 
with the Petitioner , further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 
Cite as Matter of S-A- โ–กID# 4310793 (AAO Oct. 31 , 2019) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.