dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Information Technology Consulting

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Information Technology Consulting

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed as abandoned because the Petitioner failed to respond to an AAO request to verify its intent to pursue the appeal. The decision was not made on the merits of whether the 'scrum master' position qualifies as a specialty occupation.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF B-, INC. 
APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: OCT. 31, 2019 
PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner, an information consulting services firm, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as 
a "scrum master" under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). 
The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a 
position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized 
knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its 
equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. 
The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not 
establish that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. On appeal, the Petitioner 
asserts that the Director erred in denying the petition. We will dismiss the appeal. 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicate that a different employer subsequently 
filed an H-lB petition on behalf of the Beneficiary, which has been approved. We sent a letter to the 
Petitioner requesting verification of its intent to pursue this appeal and did not receive a response 
within the allotted timeframe. A benefit request may be denied as abandoned, denied based on the 
record, or denied for both reasons if a petitioner does not respond to a request for evidence or a notice 
of intent to deny by the required date. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.2(b)(13)(i). Therefore, the appeal will be 
dismissed as abandoned because the Petitioner did not respond to our request within the time 
permitted. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed as abandoned pursuant to 8 C.F .R. ยง 103 .2(b )(13)(i). 
Cite as Matter of B-, Inc., ID# 4698523 (AAO Oct. 31, 2019) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.