remanded H-1B

remanded H-1B Case: Information Technology

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Information Technology

Decision Summary

The Director initially denied the petition, finding that the proffered 'market research analyst' position was not a specialty occupation. The AAO remanded the case because a recent court decision, Innova Sols., Inc. v. Baran, impacted the legal analysis used by the Director. The matter was returned to the Director for reconsideration in light of this new precedent.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 17248526 
Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision 
Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date : JUN. 2, 2021 
The Petitioner, an information technology and consulting services company, seeks to temporarily 
employ the Beneficiary as a "market research analyst" under the H-1 B nonirnmigrant classification for 
specialty occupations . Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified 
foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body 
of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific 
specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. 
The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition , concluding that the record did not 
establish that the proffered position is a specialty occupation, and the Petitioner filed a timely appeal. 
While the appeal was pending , the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in 
Innova Sols., Inc. v. Baran, 983 F.3d 428 (9th Cir. 2020) . Because the analysis utilized by the Director 
in arriving at her conclusion on the specialty-occupation issue appears impacted by that decision, we 
find it appropriate to remand the matter for the Director to consider the question anew, and to 
adjudicate in the first instance any additional issues as may be necessary and appropriate . 
Accordingly, the following order shall be issued. 
ORDER: The decision of the Director is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for further 
proceedings consistent with the foregoing analysis and entry of a new decision. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Draft your H-1B petition with AAO precedents

MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.

Sign Up Free →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.