remanded H-1B Case: Information Technology

U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 8912308 
Appeal of the Vermont Service Center Decision 
Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-IB) 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date : WL Y 1 7, 2020 
The Petitioner, an information technology solutions provider, seeks to temporarily employ the 
Beneficiary under the H-IB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and 
Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB 
program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that 
requires both: (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge; 
and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a 
minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. 
The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not 
establish an employer-employee relationship with the Beneficiary and that it did not demonstrate the 
Beneficiary is eligible for the requested extension of status . 1 While this appeal was pending, the U.S . 
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision in Itserve Alliance, Inc. v. Cissna, --­
F.Supp.3d ---, 2020 WL 1150186 (D.D.C. 2020). Subsequently, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration 
Services (USCIS) rescinded previously issued policy guidance and directed its officers to apply the 
existing regulatory definition at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(ii) to assess whether a petitioner and a 
beneficiary have an employer-employee relationship. USCIS Policy Memorandum PM-602-0114, 
Rescission of Policy Memoranda at 2 (June 17, 2020), http://www .uscis .gov/legal-resources /policy­
memoranda. 
Because the Director's decision did not include a discussion of the substantive nature of the proffered 
position , the Director may wish to consider whether the Petitioner has met its burden in establishing 
that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. 2 We observe several discrepancies and 
inconsistencies within the record, in addition to position descriptions that do not support a finding that 
the proffered position requires a bachelor's degree or higher in a specific specialty. 
1 The AAO does not have jurisdiction to issue decisions concerning the maintenance of lawful status or extension of status. 
2 The Petitioner designated the proffered position under the SOC code and title 15-1132, "Software Developers , 
Applications." For more information , visit the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Dep 't of Labor, Occupational Outlook 
Handbook , https://www.bis.gov/OOH/computer-and-information-technology /software-developers .htm#tab-2 and Dep't of 
Labor's O*NET summary report at https://www.onetonline .org/link/summary/15-1132 .00 (last visited Jul. 16, 2020). 
Because this case is affected by the new policy guidance, we find it appropriate to remand the matter 
for the Director to consider the question anew and to adjudicate in the first instance any additional 
issues as may be necessary and appropriate. Accordingly, the following order shall be issued. 
ORDER: The decision of the Director is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for farther 
proceedings consistent with the foregoing analysis and entry of a new decision. 
2