sustained H-1B

sustained H-1B Case: Asset Management

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Asset Management

Decision Summary

The Director initially denied the petition, finding the proffered position did not qualify as a specialty occupation. The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided a detailed job description and explained why the duties are specialized and complex within its specific business operations, establishing that the knowledge required is usually associated with a bachelor's or higher degree.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 7980580 
Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision 
Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE : APR. 27, 2020 
The Petitioner, an asset management firm, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary under the 
H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations . See Immigration and Nationality Act 
(the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S .C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) . The H-lB program allows a 
U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the 
theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment 
of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite 
for entry into the position. 
The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not 
establish that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. Upon de nova review, we will 
sustain the appeal. 
Based upon our review of the entire record of proceedings, including the submissions on appeal 
addressing the grounds for the Director's decision, we conclude that the Petitioner has overcome the 
basis of the Director's denial. The Petitioner has provided a detailed job description for the proffered 
position, and explained why these duties, when performed within the context of its specific business 
operation, are specialized and complex . Specifically , we conclude that the nature of the specific duties 
is so specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform them is usually associated with 
the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree in a specific specialty, or its equivalent, as required 
by 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4) . Further, we conclude that Petitioner has established, by a 
preponderance of the evidence, that the particular position being offered to the Beneficiary qualifies 
for classification as a specialty occupation as the term is defined at section 214(i)(l) of the Act and 8 
C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)( 4)(ii) . 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.