sustained
H-1B
sustained H-1B Case: Business Analysis
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because upon de novo review, the AAO found that the evidence of record established the proffered 'business analyst' position qualifies as a specialty occupation. The AAO concluded that the position is so complex or unique that it can only be performed by an individual with a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty, meeting the regulatory requirements.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation Theoretical And Practical Application Of A Body Of Highly Specialized Knowledge Attainment Of A Bachelor'S Or Higher Degree In The Specific Specialty 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)(2)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 3572870 Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-1B) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: DEC. 01, 2020 The Petitioner seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "business analyst" under the H-1B nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-1B program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both: (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge; and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. On appeal, the Petitioner submits a brief and contends that the petition should be approved. The Petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate el igibi I ity by a preponderance of the evidence. Section 291 of the Act; Matter of Chawathe, 25 l&N Dec. 369, 375 (AAO 2010). We review the questions in this matter de nova. See Matter of Christa's Inc., 26 l&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015). Upon de nova review, we will sustain the appeal. The evidence of record establishes that the proffered position requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty or its equivalent. It therefore qualifies for classification as a specialty occupation as the term is defined at section 214(i)(l) of the Act and 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(ii). It also establishes that the position is so complex or unique that it can only be performed by an individual with a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty, and therefore also satisfies 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2). ORDER: The appeal is sustained.
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.