sustained H-1B

sustained H-1B Case: Business Analysis

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Business Analysis

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because upon de novo review, the AAO found that the evidence of record established the proffered 'business analyst' position qualifies as a specialty occupation. The AAO concluded that the position is so complex or unique that it can only be performed by an individual with a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty, meeting the regulatory requirements.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation Theoretical And Practical Application Of A Body Of Highly Specialized Knowledge Attainment Of A Bachelor'S Or Higher Degree In The Specific Specialty 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)(2)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 3572870 
Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision 
Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-1B) 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date: DEC. 01, 2020 
The Petitioner seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "business analyst" under the H-1B 
nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) 
section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-1B program allows a U.S. 
employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both: (a) the 
theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge; and (b) the attainment 
of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite 
for entry into the position. 
The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not 
establish that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. On appeal, the Petitioner 
submits a brief and contends that the petition should be approved. 
The Petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate el igibi I ity by a preponderance of the evidence. 
Section 291 of the Act; Matter of Chawathe, 25 l&N Dec. 369, 375 (AAO 2010). We review the 
questions in this matter de nova. See Matter of Christa's Inc., 26 l&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015). 
Upon de nova review, we will sustain the appeal. 
The evidence of record establishes that the proffered position requires the theoretical and practical 
application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree 
in the specific specialty or its equivalent. It therefore qualifies for classification as a specialty occupation 
as the term is defined at section 214(i)(l) of the Act and 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(ii). It also establishes that 
the position is so complex or unique that it can only be performed by an individual with a bachelor's degree 
in a specific specialty, and therefore also satisfies 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2). 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.