sustained H-1B Case: Information Technology
Decision Summary
The director initially denied the petition, concluding that the petitioner failed to establish that the proffered position of 'senior marketing systems analyst' is a specialty occupation. Upon de novo review, the AAO concluded that the petitioner did establish that the position qualifies as a specialty occupation and that the beneficiary is qualified to perform its duties, leading to the appeal being sustained.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 8302848 Appeal of California Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date : MAR . 31, 2020 The Petitioner, a knowledge as a service information technology company, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "senior marketing systems analyst" under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 10l(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position . The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner failed to establish that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. On appeal, the Petitioner submits additional evidence and contends that the petition should be approved . In these proceedings, it is the Petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the requested benefit. We follow the preponderance of the evidence standard as specified in Matter of Chawathe , 25 I&N Dec . 369, 375-76 (AAO 2010). Upon de nova review, we conclude that the Petitioner has established that the proffered position qualifies for classification as a specialty occupation as defined by section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1184(i)(l), and 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(ii) . Further, the record also establishes that the Beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of the proffered position. ORDER: The appeal is sustained .
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.