sustained H-1B

sustained H-1B Case: Semiconductor Engineering

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Semiconductor Engineering

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided new evidence on appeal. This new evidence, combined with the original job description, successfully demonstrated that the duties of the 'Analog Engineer' position are sufficiently complex and unique to require a bachelor's degree or higher in a specific specialty, thereby meeting the definition of a specialty occupation.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation Position Duties Complexity Beneficiary Qualifications

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 10144475 
Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision 
Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date : JUNE 8, 2020 
The Petitioner , a semiconductor manufacturer , seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as an 
"Analog Engineer " under the H-lB nonimrnigrant classification for specialty occupations . See 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง l 10l(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) . 
The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a 
position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized 
knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor ' s or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its 
equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. 
The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition , concluding that the record did not 
establish that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. 
The Petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence . 
Section 291 of the Act; Matter of Chawathe , 25 l&N Dec. 369, 375 (AAO 2010). 
Upon de nova review , we conclude that the Petitioner has established that the proffered position 
qualifies for classification as a specialty occupation as defined by section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S .C. 
ยง l 184(i)(l) , and 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(ii). The Petitioner provided new evidence on appeal that, 
when considered in conjunction with the job description previously submitted , establishes that the 
position duties are so complex or unique that they can only be performed by an individual with a 
baccalaureate or higher degree in a specific specialty or its equivalent , as required by the regulation 
at 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2). Further , the record establishes that the Beneficiary is qualified to 
perform the duties of the proffered position under section 214(i)(2) of the Act; 8 C.F.R 
ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C)(J). 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained . 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.