Dismissed
L-1A
L-1A Dismissed — Automotive Parts (2006): did not meet any specific erroneous conclusion of law or
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal, as required by regulations. Counsel for the petitioner indicated a brief would be sent but never submitted it or any other evidence, even after a follow-up request from the AAO.
Criteria Discussed
Managerial Or Executive Capacity Procedural Requirements For Appeal
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more L-1A decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →