L-1A Dismissed — Computer Parts Manufacturing (2061): did not meet an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original denial. The petitioner attempted to correct the beneficiary's employment start date on appeal, but failed to provide sufficient objective evidence to resolve inconsistencies in the record and prove the beneficiary had the required one continuous year of employment abroad with a qualifying organization.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF