dismissed L-1A Case: Computer Software

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
PUBLIC COPY 
 >% 7 
File: SRC 04 069 50342 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: MAY 0 4 2006 
Petition: 
 Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(15)(L) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 9 1 101(a)(15)(L) 
IN BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
dministrative Appeals Office 
SRC 04 069 50342 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The director, Texas Service Center, denied the petition for a nonimmigrant visa. The matter 
is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. 
The petitioner states that it is engaged in the computer software business. 
 The petitioner filed this 
nonimmigrant petition seeking to extend its authorization to employ the beneficiary temporarily in the United 
States as its president pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 
U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(L). The director denied the pktition, concluding that the petitioner has failed to 
establish that the beneficiary will be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity. 
On appeal, counsel for the petitioner disagrees with the director's decision and asserts that the record and prior 
L-1A approvals indicate that the beneficiary has been and will be employed by the petitioner in a managerial 
capacity. 
A review of the records of the Citizenship and Immigration Services indicates that this beneficiary is also the 
beneficiary of an approved immigrant petition and has adjusted status to that of a permanent resident as of 
January 1 1,2005. While the petitioner has not withdrawn the appeal in this proceeding, it would appear that the 
beneficiary is presently a permanent resident and the issues in this proceeding are moot. Therefore, this appeal is 
dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed as moot.