L-1A Dismissed — Construction (2006): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision. The AAO also affirmed the director's findings that the petitioner failed to establish the beneficiary would be employed in a qualifying managerial or executive capacity, as his duties primarily involved performing the day-to-day services of the business. Additionally, the petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence of a qualifying corporate relationship between the U.S. and foreign entities.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF