L-1A Dismissed — Construction (2005): did not meet any specific erroneous conclusion of law or

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision, as required by regulation. The petitioner did not submit any brief or additional evidence to address the director's findings that the beneficiary would not be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity and that the U.S. entity had not been actively doing business.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF