dismissed L-1A Case: Food Manufacturing

lipedfm data&W ted 
vent deafly unwe P" dvsy iavsion of P~Q 
pmc COPY 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 
Washington, DC 20520 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
File: SRC 04 147 52544 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: DEc 2 2 fllllS 
Petition: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 4 1 101(a)(15)(L) 
IN BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
-7' *- 
/'- 3' 
,/-+- - --- 
Robert P. mmann, Director 
Adminlstrat~ve Appeals Office 
SRC 04 147 52544 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the nonimmigrant visa petition. The matter is 
now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be rejected. 
The petitioner is a corporation organized in the State of Oklahoma that engages in the manufacture and sale of 
Middle Eastern sweets and pastries. It seeks to classify the beneficiary as an intracompany transferee 
pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 
1 lOl(a)(lS)(L). 
Noting that the record was deficient, the director requested additional evidence in support of the petition. 
After the petitioner failed to submit the requested evidence, the director denied the petition for abandonment, 
pursuant to 8 C.F.R. tj 103.2(b)(15). 
The director correctly informed the petitioner that no appeal would lie fiom the decision. Regardless, the 
petitioner submitted an appeal on January 24,2005. 
The regulations provide that no appeal lies from the denial of a petition for abandonment. 8 C.F.R. 
5 103.20>)(15). As there is no appeal from the director's denial, the petitioner's appeal must be rejected. 
ORDER: The appeal is rejected.