dismissed
L-1A
dismissed L-1A Case: Furniture Manufacturing
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed on procedural grounds. The Petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's original decision, as required by 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v).
Criteria Discussed
Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Fact
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF A-D-F-C-, LTD APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: MAR. 1, 2018 PETITION: FORM I-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER The Petitioner, a children's furniture manufacturing company, seeks to extend the Beneficiary's temporary employment under the L-1 A nonimmigrant classification for intracompany transferees. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 10l(a)(l5)(L), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(l5)(L). The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 8 C.F.R. ~ 103.3(a)(l)(v). On appeal, the Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision. On the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 30 days of tiling. In addition, the Petitioner requested an extension to file a brief for six months and was granted a three month extension to file a brief or additional evidence. On February 5, 2018, we received a brief and additional evidence from the Petitioner. However the Petitioner's supplemental brief did not state an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact and contained previously submitted evidence. Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). Cite as Mauer ofA-D-F-C-. LTD, ID# 1179875 (AAO Mar. I, 2018)
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.