dismissed L-1A

dismissed L-1A Case: Furniture Manufacturing

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Furniture Manufacturing

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed on procedural grounds. The Petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's original decision, as required by 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v).

Criteria Discussed

Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Fact

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF A-D-F-C-, LTD 
APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: MAR. 1, 2018 
PETITION: FORM I-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner, a children's furniture manufacturing company, seeks to extend the Beneficiary's 
temporary employment under the L-1 A nonimmigrant classification for intracompany transferees. 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 10l(a)(l5)(L), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(l5)(L). The 
Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. 
Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. ~ 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
On appeal, the Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically 
identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision. On the Form I-290B, Notice of 
Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 
30 days of tiling. In addition, the Petitioner requested an extension to file a brief for six months and 
was granted a three month extension to file a brief or additional evidence. On February 5, 2018, we 
received a brief and additional evidence from the Petitioner. However the Petitioner's supplemental 
brief did not state an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact and contained previously 
submitted evidence. Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of 
law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
Cite as Mauer ofA-D-F-C-. LTD, ID# 1179875 (AAO Mar. I, 2018) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.