dismissed
L-1A
dismissed L-1A Case: Grocery And Computer Hardware Distribution
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected on procedural grounds, not on the merits of the case. The AAO determined the appeal was not properly filed because the Form G-28, Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney, was signed by the beneficiary, who is not a recognized party with the standing to file an appeal.
Criteria Discussed
Proper Filing Of Appeal Standing To Appeal Managerial Or Executive Capacity
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave.. N.W., Rm. A3042 Washington. DC 20529 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration File: Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: Mb:l 1 9 2005 Petition: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101 (a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 3 1 101 (a)(15)(L) IN BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 2-3 R bert P. Wiemann, Dire or l~dministrative Appeals Office Page 2 DISCUSSION: The Director of the California Service Center denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be rejected pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A). The petitioner operates a grocery and acts as a distributor of computer hardware. It seeks to employ the beneficiary as its President, and has petitioned to classify the beneficiary as an L-1A nonimmigrant intracompany transferee pursuant to section 101 (a)( 15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. $ 1101(a)(15)(L). The director denied the petition after determining that the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary will be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity. The Form G-28, Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative, that was submitted for the record was signed by the beneficiary, not by an authorized representative of the petitioner. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) regulations specifically prohibit a beneficiary of a visa petition, or a representative acting on a beneficiary's behalf, from filing a petition; the beneficiary of a visa petition is not a recognized party in a proceeding. 8 C.F.R. 3 103.2(a)(3). As the beneficiary and his representative are not recognized parties, counsel is not authorized to file an appeal. 8 C.F.R. $ 103.3(a)(l)(iii)(B). As the appeal was not properly filed, it will be rejected. 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A)(I). ORDER: The appeal is rejected.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.