dismissed L-1A Case: Hair Products
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity. While the AAO noted the director's initial reasoning regarding current staffing levels was flawed for a 'new office' case, its own de novo review concluded that the evidence was insufficient to demonstrate the proposed U.S. operation would support a qualifying managerial or executive position within one year.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.
Start a Stronger Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.