L-1A Dismissed — Hospitality Goods Retail (2010): did not meet any erroneous conclusion of law or statement

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original denial. The petitioner's counsel stated they would submit a brief and additional evidence to prove the beneficiary's role was primarily managerial, but failed to do so, leaving the record unchanged.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF