dismissed L-1A Case: Intracompany Transferee

MM?dfvw aata aaeoed to 
t dearly unnsrrsntolt 
P=- invasion of ~ersonal D~V~P 
PUBLIC COPY 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
File: SRC 04 073 51639 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: MAY 1 0 2006 
IN RE: 
 Applicant: 
Application: 
 Application to Extend Status as Spouse of a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 
g 2 14.2(1)(15)(ii) 
ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
--&$ obert P. Wieman ief 
@ 
dministrative  peals Office 
SRC 04 073 5 1639 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the application for an extension of nonimmigrant 
status. The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be 
rejected. 
The applicant filed the application seeking to extend her period of stay as the nonimmigrant spouse of an L-1 
intracompany transferee pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 9 2 14.2(1)(15)(ii). On July 2 1,2004, 2004, the director notified 
the applicant of the denial of her application for extension of stay filed on Form 1-539, as the applicant's 
spouse's nonimmigrant petition had been denied on that date. 
The principal applicant, through counsel, filed a Form I-290B in an attempt to appeal the decision of the 
director. On appeal, counsel asserts that the application should have been approved, as the record sufficiently 
demonstrates that the applicant's spouse is qualified for the extension of status sought in L-1A classification. 
It is noted that 8 C.F.R. 9 214.1(~)(5) states that there is no appeal from the denial of an application for 
extension of stay filed on Form 1-129 or 1-539. Accordingly, the applicant's appeal must be rejected. 
ORDER: The appeal is rejected.