L-1A Dismissed — Investment (2006): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision. The director had revoked the initial approval due to a lack of evidence establishing a qualifying relationship, that the beneficiary would be employed in a managerial/executive capacity, that both U.S. and foreign entities were actively doing business, and that the new office had secured adequate physical premises.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF