L-1A Dismissed — Investment And Food Service (2014): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the beneficiary would be employed in a qualifying managerial or executive capacity, as the job description was overly broad and included non-qualifying operational tasks. Additionally, the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove it had been 'doing business' for the required one-year period for a new office extension.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF