L-1A Dismissed — Investment Services (2005): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact made by the director. The underlying revocation was based on the director's findings that the petitioner did not provide credible evidence of the beneficiary's employment abroad in a managerial or executive capacity and failed to establish sufficient physical premises for the new office.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF