dismissed L-1A Case: Investments And Construction
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision. The AAO also affirmed the denial on the merits, finding that the petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity or that the new office had met the requirements for an extension, such as demonstrating sufficient staffing and financial viability.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.
Start a Stronger Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.