dismissed L-1A Case: Management

PUBLIC COpy
identifying data deleted to
prevent clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal pri vacy
File: SRC 03 060 50273
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Rm. A3000
Washington, DC 20529
u.s.Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
n· , . · , . , ' , · . · · , · · · . · . · ·...·.·...·~,.....·.i(.t...... ::::1...:.....')7"
",,:'
Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: APR 0 5Z007
IN RE: Petitioner:
Beneficiary:
Petition: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(L)
IN BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
INSTRUCTIONS:
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office.
--'-~ .....
. ~~.~
Robert P. Wiemann, Chief
Administrative Appeals Office
www.uscis.gov
SRC 03 060 50273
Page 2
DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the petition for a nonimmigrant visa. The
petitioner appealed this decision to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). The AAO dismissed this
appeal on August 1, 2005. The petitioner filed a motion to reconsider or reopen the decision of the AAO.
The motion will be dismissed as moot.
The petitioner filed this nonimmigrant visa petition seeking to extend the employment of the beneficiary in
the position of general manager as an L-IA nonimmigrant intracompany transferee pursuant to section
101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(l5)(L). The director
denied the petition concluding that the petitioner failed to establish (l) that the petitioner is doing business; or
(2) that the beneficiary would be employed primarily in a managerial or executive capacity. The AAO
dismissed the subsequently filed appeal.
The petitioner filed the instant motion to reconsider or reopen the AAO's decision.
A review of Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicates that this beneficiary is also the beneficiary of
an approved immigrant petition and has adjusted status to that of a permanent resident on January 4, 2006. While
the petitioner has not withdrawn the instant motion, it would appear that the beneficiary is presently a permanent
resident and the issues in this proceeding are moot. Therefore, this motion is dismissed.
ORDER: The motion is dismissed as moot.