dismissed L-1A

dismissed L-1A Case: Manufacturing

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Manufacturing

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed on procedural grounds. The Petitioner filed an appeal but failed to submit a brief or any statement that specifically identified an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's original decision, as required by regulation.

Criteria Discussed

Failure To Identify Specific Error Of Law Or Fact

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF 0-I-, LLC 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: JUNE 20,2017 
APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM I-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner, a manufacturer of fire motor pumps, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a 
manager of its new office under the L-1A nonimmigrant classification for intracompany transferees. 
See Immigration and Nationality Act section 101(a)(15)(L), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(L). The L-1A 
classification allows a corporation or other legal entity (including its affiliate or subsidiary) to transfer a 
qualifying foreign employee to the United States to work temporarily in a managerial or executive 
capacity. 
The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on 
appeal. Upon review,we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
The Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identifies an 
erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form I-290B, Notice of 
Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 
30 days of the January 17, 2017, filing date. However, we have not received anything further from 
the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified a specific, erroneous conclusion of 
law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
Cite as Matter of 0-1-, LLC, ID# 400705 (AAO June 20, 20 17) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.