dismissed
L-1A
dismissed L-1A Case: Not Specified
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel formally requested its withdrawal. The AAO did not rule on the merits of the case, instead closing the matter based on the petitioner's request.
Criteria Discussed
Not specified
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
identifying data deleted to prevent clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Rm. A3000 Washington, DC 20529 U. S. Citizenship and Immigration File: WAC 05 081 54650 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: 2 3 2006 Petition: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 8 1 10 1 (a)(15)(L) IN BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS : This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. DISCUSSION: The nonirnmigrant visa petition was denied by the director, California Service Center. The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. On September 29, 2006, counsel for the petitioner requested that the appeal be withdrawn.' ORDER: The appeal is dismissed based on its withdrawal by counsel. J-- ' . ~obeh. Wiemann, Administrative Appeals Office 'While the petitioner identifies itself in the petition as "Department X, Inc.," the public records of the State of California and other organizational and business documents submitted by the petitioner reveal that the petitioner's name is actually "Department.X, Inc."
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.