dismissed L-1A

dismissed L-1A Case: Pastry Production

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Pastry Production

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed on procedural grounds. The Petitioner failed to identify a specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision and did not submit a promised brief or additional evidence within the allotted time, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v).

Criteria Discussed

Failure To Identify Specific Error Of Law Or Fact

View Full Decision Text

U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
MATTER OF D-1- LLC
APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION
Non-Precedent Decision of the
Administrative Appeals Office
DATE: DEC.26.2017
PETITION: FORM I-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER
The Petitioner, which describes itself as a pastry production and ingredient distribution company and
culinary schooL seeks to extend the Beneficiary's temporary employment as its director under the L-1 A
nonimmigrant classification for intracompany transferees. See Immigration and Nationality Act
section 101(a)(15)(L), 8 U.S.C. § 110l(a)(l5)(L). TheL-IA classification allows a corporation or other
legal entity (including its affiliate or subsidiary) to transfer a qualifying foreign employee to the United
States to work temporarily in a managerial or executive capacity.
The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on
appeal. Upon review. we will summarily dismiss the appeal.
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned
fails to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal.
8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v).
The Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identities an
erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form
I-2908. Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would
be submitted within 30 days of the June 26. 2017. tiling date. However. we have not received
anything further from the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified a specific.
erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below. the appeal must be
summarily dismissed.
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1 03.3(a)(l )(v).
Cite as Matter ofD-1- LLC. 10# 927820 (AAO Dec. 26. 2017)

Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.