dismissed L-1A Case: Petrochemical Technology

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
- $-p + **I-) ,g 2 > :I. vJ-$f$ d&& #3gl@[gQ &j 20 Mass. Rm. A3042,425 I Street. N.W. 
Washington, DC 20529 
- ""*- *-w"i!'Yr, QWq?r&q 
+%:,G+%B~ 1.8 w?mma) +kypqr. U. S. Citizenship 
+Ji>$$ and Immigration 
2, < 
<- * 44d $&, k.<yp 7 
J 
L. 
FILE: EAC 03 15 1 52749 Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: My \ 3 206 
IN RE: Petitioner: 
Beneficia 
PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(I 5)(L) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 l,lOl(aX15)(L) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any hrther inquiry must be made to that office. 
? Robert P. Wiemann, Director 
bdministralive Appeals Ottlce 
EAC 03 151 52749 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The Director, Vermont Service Center, denied the petition for a nonimmigrant visa. The 
matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Ofice (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. 
The petitioner states that it is a petrochemical technology licensing firm. It seeks to extend its authorization 
to employ the beneficiary temporarily in the United States as its cost control analyst, pursuant to section 
101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1101(a)(15)(L). The director 
denied the petition, concluding that the petitioner has failed to establish that the beneficiary would be 
employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity, or that the U.S. entity currently can support such a 
position. 
On appeal, counsel for the petitioner contends that the beneficiary qualifies as an intra-company transferee under 
the statute because she "manages an essential function within the organization." Counsel also asserts that the 
beneficiary possesses "specialized knowledge" of the' company and the industry. 
A review of the records of the Citizenship and Immigration Services indicates that this beneficiary is also the 
beneficiary of an approved immigrant petition, filed by the same employer, and has adjusted status to that of a 
permanent resident status as of July 13, 2004. While the petitioner has not withdrawn the appeal in this 
proceeding, it would appear that the beneficiary is presently a permanent resident and the issues in this 
proceeding are moot. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed as moot.