L-1A Dismissed — Real Estate Development (2007): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily executive or managerial capacity for the new office extension. The director concluded that the beneficiary would be primarily involved in performing the day-to-day services essential to running the business, rather than supervising a staff that would relieve them from performing non-qualifying duties.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF