L-1A Dismissed — Real Estate Investment And Retail (2009): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity for the requested extension period. The director found the evidence insufficient to prove the beneficiary's duties met the statutory definitions, and the AAO upheld this determination.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF