L-1A Dismissed — Restaurant (2009): did not meet any specific error of law or fact in the

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific error of law or fact in the director's decision. The petitioner did not provide a sufficiently detailed description of the beneficiary's duties to prove they were primarily managerial, nor did they adequately document staffing levels to show that the beneficiary would be relieved from performing the day-to-day operational tasks of the restaurant.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF